Moncler’s Disconnect

Moncler Puts Live Wolves and Polar Bear Mascots On the Runway
Photo: Complex

Moncler, an expensive Italian outerwear and accessories line known for quilted down, decided to send some animals down the runway in Paris. Some of the animals featured in their AW13/14 collection were on leash, and some roamed leashless through the audience. Others were killed and in the form of coats and accessories. People in faux-fur polar bear costumes hugged the models at the end of the show, and this over-the-top spectacle seemed like all fun and frivolity in the name of fashion. But, like many people who saw the show, something seemed odd. There is a glaring disconnect that Moncler shares with other brands determined to say relevant in the luxury arena: Why we adore some animals, and do things to others that would showcase a deep hatred? Why adore dogs, yet wear the pelts of countless other animals like fox and mink who spent their entire lives on fur farms, deprived of every evolutionary desire, then anally and vaginally electrocuted, gassed, poisoned or bludgeoned to death. Why celebrate polar bears, yet subject other fur bearing animals like coyote and lynx to the languishing death of a steel jaw trap or snare, when they spend days bleeding, dehydrating, and even attempting to chew off their own paw to escape? As I spoke about with Berluti’s recent show at Paris’ Museum Museum of Natural history, this is fashion carnsim:

“…it’s rare that an opportunity to connect these dots so obviously presents itself. Fashion carnism, like traditional carnism, is a dominant, violent ideology that, according to Dr. Melanie Joy ,”…need[s] to use a set of social and psychological defense mechanisms to enable humane people to participate in inhumane practices without fully realizing what they’re doing.”

Moncler_1
photo: Refinery 29

Aesthetic irrationality is when we rationalize an object strictly based on its aesthetic appearance. In this line of logic, pretty and handsome are seen as a “good” regardless of the production process. Here, a typical dead-pile at a fur farm in Russia, are the parts of the animals that did not make it onto the coats or into the show:


photo by Sergey Maximishin

In early 2011 Born Free USA and Respect for Animals conducted a landmark investigation inside the world of fur trapping. They uncovered shocking cruelty and brutality involved in the trapping of wild animals for the fur trade:

Most people do not see animals like a fox or raccoon as capable of valuing their own lives  – at least not enough to outweigh desires to wear them or make money on their pelts. Don’t get me wrong, if I was living off the grid in the arctic circle eating blubber, I’d have no problem wearing fur.  But I also wouldn’t have to worry about an insatiable fashion industry obfuscating my clothing and turning it into a symbol of power, or representing romantic native rationalizations of food and clothing. The truth is that most simply don’t need the fur to survive, that the most exciting innovations are happening in the realms of high-tech, sustainable synthetics, bio-printing, 3D printing, organic plant-based materials like Japan’s biodegradable poly and other bio-plastics. Fur is just bad design and it’s only a matter of time before it is phased out completely.

Tell Moncler how you feel by leaving a message on their Facebook wall.

Victim versus Violence

by D. R. Hildebrand

Six years ago star quarterback Michael Vick was sentenced to two years in jail for promoting, funding, and facilitating a dogfighting operation, then lying about the details of his involvement.  He served his sentence, paid his fine, participated in community service, and eventually returned to the NFL with the Philadelphia Eagles.

Now Vick has written an autobiography, Finally Free, with the hope of articulating his gratitude for second chances.  He was recently set to sign copies of the book at book stores but cancelled when “reported protests escalated into threats of violence” not only against Vick but his family, his publisher, and the retailers that were scheduled to host him.

Michael Vick Humane Society
(Photo: Raleigh News & Observer/Getty)

Debating Vick’s crime, his sentence, the degree to which he is remorseful and so on will likely continue for some time.  My own opinions about these issues have vacillated, even unexpectedly, the more I learn and the more I consider.  It is the bigger picture, though—the response to it all and the context of it all—that I find consistently, relentlessly baffling.

Vick’s crime was heinous.  No one I know disputes that.  The reaction that has surfaced from it, however, is the wrong one.  Our discussions are focused almost exclusively on the victims and not on the pathology of violence.  We are angered because they are dogs, not because we permit and perpetuate a vast culture of abuse.  These events would not, six years later, still sit at the fore of our thoughts had anyone been mistreating any other animal—including, even, humans. Read more…

Bambi is Dead

by Patrick LaDuke

Humor Chic is a fashion blog by aleXsandro Palombo who critiques and satirizes fashion through illustration. It is updated just about daily, keeping you in the know of fashion’s latest controversies. He also happens to be a strong human and animal right’s advocate reporting on issues such as Cambodians being payed slave wages by H&M, the illegal trade of python skins for luxury fashion, and the Chinese fad of keeping live fish and turtles in keychains.

Below are a few images from his ongoing attack campaign STOP ANIMAL CRUELTY, targeting the likes of Anna Wintour, Karl Lagerfeld and fashion label Fendi.

Challenging Carnism

by D. R. Hildebrand

Challenging Carnism

Earlier this month I read about a student in Great Britain who was eating, what he believed to be, the wing, or the breast, or the thigh of a chicken, at a KFC.  He happened to pull the flesh apart, and saw something that looked like a brain.  He grew nauseated, photographed the specimen, and posted it on his Facebook page.  Eventually, KFC identified it to be a kidney, and apologized.

I posted the story on my own Facebook page and asked, both sarcastically and in seriousness, what the big deal was—that we should know by now that in a world in which “food producers” have zero interest in ethics or expectations, but rather in turning sentient creatures into a profit, there will be no shortage of mistakes.  One person disagreed and replied, “By your logic, if you get a piece of bark in your orange juice, you should have realized that oranges grow on trees.”

The point, as is often the case among omnivores, was either deflected or missed: if you opt to eat a breast or a rib or any part of an animal, what prevents you from eating any other part as well?  A foot, a stomach, an egg?  Eating one body part and not another is a mere cultural contrivance, not a natural law or inherent truth.  There is no universal norm stating that kidneys are taboo while wings, breasts, and thighs are acceptable.  In some societies people consume hearts, livers, blood, and urine.  Only in desperation do people eat bark.  If I mistakenly bought a grapefruit instead of an orange I would only care because I happen to enjoy the latter more than the former, not because I have been programmed by a self-serving system that declares one to be repulsive and the other ideal.  In the end, kidneys, like nearly all body parts, are edible.  Most bark is not.  And kidneys are necessary to one’s being, whereas oranges fall if not plucked.

Coincidentally, horse meat was then found where there should have been cow.  All over the UK there is outrage and shock that twenty-nine percent of the beef they call burgers is that of horses: “People should be able to go into the supermarket,” one Labour politician said, “and be confident that what they are buying for their families is legal and safe.”  That it is what?  Legal and safe?  Why is horse meat neither legal nor safe when the pigs we deem “dirty” are a staple at breakfast?  What is so fundamentally different about the flesh of a horse than that of a cow, a sheep, a dog?

Nothing.  And herein lies the issue: meat-eaters are not flabbergasted by the sale and production of horse per se, for they eat the flesh of countless species; neither are they sickened at the notion of eating a chicken’s kidney, for they eat hot dogs made of penises and eye balls and much more.  Meat-eaters are upset because they have been challenged.  They have been challenged to face their inconsistencies.  They have been challenged to confront their choices.  By eating animals and parts of animals that they have been programmed to believe they absolutely never should, they have been challenged to ask why they eat some and not others, or any, for that matter, at all.  And they hate this.  They hate to be challenged when they could much more easily be ignorant.  They cannot answer the questions because there is none that makes sense.

Melanie Joy, professor and author of the book Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows, gave a remarkably lucid interview with Andrew Cohen on essentially this topic, this carnist view of animals and the dampened emotions on which it stands.  “Carnism,” Joy explains, “teaches us not to feel.”  It is the invisible belief system that conditions us to eat certain sentient creatures and not others.  Interestingly, Joy is not concerned with why vegans abstain from eating animals, but rather why omnivores choose to eat the specific animals they do.

Few omnivores are either used to, or comfortable with, this sort of framing of the discussion.  Vegans make the weird choices.  Vegans have the explaining to do.  The fact of the matter is, while we all make choices, few meat-eaters can explain why they make their specific choices.  They don’t know why they eat cows and not horses.  They don’t know why they eat breasts and not kidneys.  The carnist view is so dominant and so entrenched that they see it as good enough that they are part of the norm.  Even their go-to answer, “Because I just like the taste, damn it!” is not valid here because Brits were eating innumerable horses without any display of revulsion; and kidneys, from what I have read, are supposed to be delicious.

Continuing to challenge meat-eaters to defend their choices is essential to raising the awareness about which Joy speaks.  It is not cognitive awareness, for we all know the horrors of slaughter.  Rather, it is emotional awareness, “taking it into your heart,” as Joy says, and reflecting on it, processing it, and responding to it with action.  Defending veganism is effortless.  It is all logic.  Defending carnism is the opposite.  It is complete absurdity.  No carnist should ever be excused from this defense, simply because the challenge is too great.

Almost Autumn

• September is the inspiration for wooden Parisian sunglasses, the intriguing smell of vetiver, organic patterned shirts, good reads, hydrated faces, recycled umbrellas, Canadian organic chinos and some seriously sick, better-than-leather kicks.

http://cdn.paulsmith.co.uk/media/catalog/product/cache/7/image/408x/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/j/g/jgfj-644l-418-n-102219.jpghttp://cdn.sparkart.net/pangeaorganics/content/store-product/1341974094.49257.PANGEA_FACIAL_CREAM_NIGERIAN_GINGER.jpg

http://www.londonundercover.co.uk/dyn/p_36.jpghttp://distilleryimage3.instagram.com/024b698af45511e1b28822000a1c9e1a_7.jpg

VETIVER 46http://www.bravegentleman.com/magento/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/t/h/thieves_pant_beige_1.jpg

Liberation - Pine - Men's
Boot 17http://www.unstitchedutilities.com/files/imagecache/product_list/Srgt%20Major%20Low%20black%20new%20wtbg.jpg